Module 6: Understanding

Home

Basic Methods of Instruction

1.Kinds of Learning
2.Invariant Tasks
3.Concept Classification
4.Procedure Using
5.Principle Using
6.Understanding
7.Generic Skills
8.Attitudes

Comments
Site Map
Print it!
Principles for Teaching Understanding Case Study

Imagine your friend, Jennifer, has just found out that her student, Sam, needs to learn what a revolution is (as in a revolutionary war). She knows that it is important for him and that he does not already know what it is. She realizes that the methods she used to teach the names of the Presidents of the United States won't work very well here, but she doesn't know what to do. So she has come to you for more advice.

You, of course, know that a revolution is an armed uprising against a ruling authority; that to be a revolution rather than a rebellion, it must be widespread; and that to be a revolution rather than an invasion, it must be waged by people within the territory of the ruling authority (government). You can see right away that this is the conceptual understanding type of learning.

Based on what you now know about how this kind of learning occurs, what do you think you should advise Jennifer to do first? Think about it, and jot your answer below.

First, Jennifer assessed Sam's needs and found out that he should be taught what a revolution is. Next, we have seen that she must assure mastery of relevant prior understandings. But then what should she do? Remember that Bloom identified learner participation as perhaps the most important determinant of the quality of instruction. Also remember that presentation, practice, and feedback have proven to be routine components for both memorization and skill application, although the nature of each routine component is quite different for each kind of learning. Given all of this, what are the most important recommendations you could give to Jennifer for teaching what a revolution is? Think about it, and jot your answer below. 

But what about learner participation? Well, as far as practice is concerned, Jennifer can ask Sam to explain in his own words what a revolution is. Or she can ask him to explain in his own words the differences between a revolution and an invasion (which was already explained to him). But such "regurgitation" questions don't require much depth of processing. How do you think Jennifer could help cause greater depth and breadth of processing? Think about it, and jot your answer below. 

Summary

The following is a summary of what you should do to design instruction for facilitating understanding: 

1. Decide what to teach

Assess the need.  Analyze the goals. 
Analyze the learner's current knowledge.
Determine type of understanding (conceptual or causal). 

 
 
The following tactics are for facilitating conceptual understanding.

2. Assure important prior knowledge has been acquired 
    (e.g., prerequisite understandings, meaningful context). 

Assess with a pretest. 
Remediate if necessary.
 
3. Give the presentation (context, information, relationship).  Activate a meaningful context. 
Relate the new knowledge to it. 
Describe the new knowledge. 
Provide enhancement, if needed (see #6 below).
 
4. Provide practiceTactic: Paraphrasing the knowledge. 
Elaborating the knowledge.  Relating it to superordinate knowledge with ... context. 
Relating it to coordinate knowledge with . . . comparison / contrast. 
Relating it to subordinate knowledge with . . . analysis. 
Relating it to experiential knowledge with . . . instantiation. 
Relating it to analogical knowledge with . . . analogy. 
Relating it to causal knowledge with . . . inference. 
Relating it to procedural knowledge with . . . function. 
Identifying roles with . . . roles.
Note: The types of relationships (dimensions of understanding) that are important for a given concept should be included in the test, practice, and (if enhancement is required) presentation. However, the object of each of these types of relationships (i.e., what the new knowledge is being related to) should be different in the test, practice, and presentation.
5. Provide feedbackConfirm or correct.
 
6. Provide enhancement as needed.  For the presentation:  Use a guided discovery approach. 
Use elaboration techniques:  Relating it to superordinate knowledge with ... context. 
Relating it to coordinate knowledge with . . . comparison / contrast. 
Relating it to subordinate knowledge with . . . analysis. 
Relating it to experiential knowledge with . . . instantiation. 
Relating it to analogical knowledge with . . . analogy. 
Relating it to causal knowledge with . . . inference. 
Relating it to procedural knowledge with . . . function. 
Identifying logical relationships with . . . implication. 
Identifying roles with . . . roles.
For the practice:  Use hints (prompting). For the feedback:  For a wrong answer, use hints in question form.
 
7. Provide systematic reviewRequire the learner to use the knowledge at several evenly spaced points in time over the remainder of the course.
 


Search    Comments   Print it    Site Map
Home Green Book I Green Book II Basic Methods of Instruction EPSS Other Sites


This file was last updated on February 28, 1999 by Eun-Ok Baek
Copyright 1999, Charles M. Reigeluth